In marketing, lead scoring is useful to determine the potential value of a client. At its core, lead scoring helps marketers find out which clients are truly interested in making a purchase and which ones are just considering their options. Many of these metrics can be used – with very little adaptation or modification – in the niche of membership management, too.
Membership engagement is difficult to measure. With so many different metrics and factors involved, many organizational leaders are rarely looking at the whole picture. To increase your effectiveness when trying to benchmark and measure your association’s membership engagement, consider the following data sets:
Other types of data are also involved, including online and offline shopping habits, seasonal trends, regional data and more. With so much information at play, it’s easy to get bogged down in unnecessary or irrelevant details while missing the most important data.
In order to determine engagement based on the information you’ve collected thus far, it’s critical that you analyze and interpret all this data. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, but it’s often done by grading membership engagement to help determine their overall return on investment, or ROI.
Think of it like a grade school report card. While it’s up to each individual association to establish their own grading range, many use a simple, point-based scoring system. The Florida Association of Insurance Agents, for example, recently adopted a point-based platform that consists of three separate tiers:
As you can see, those who land in Tier 1 offer their association the highest ROI. While members in Tier 3 produce a lower ROI in general, they’re still important to your organization’s bottom line.
There are also many myths surrounding membership engagement, including the false assumptions that associations and membership sites are an easy way to make a passive income, that you need to spend all your time attracting new members or that it takes substantial investments to start measuring engagement.
“I found Impexium to be more modern, more sophisticated, more user friendly, more intuitive.”
“I like the fact that by using Impexium versus our previous system, we will be able to reduce staff’s workload. As a result, NAADAC’s staff will be happy, feel more capable and competent…in serving our members.”
“We wanted a partner that would grow with us and one that could innovate with us. Impexium checked all those boxes. They took us from outdated to automated.”
“…Impexium has allowed us to significantly improve our processes and procedures. We’ve automated quite a lot with Impexium and removed a number of manual processes that we had before. And staff are very happy about that.”
“…very excited because of the possibilities that I see for NADA moving forward, the ability to give our executives the information, any intelligence that they need in order to help our members better…the ability to simplify the whole application ecosystem, removing unbelievable complexity and bringing simplicity to the application.”
“You have to have a support team that communicates clearly, is a good listener, is patient and can really handle the problem solving…I have been really pleased with Impexium’s support. They are on-top-of things responsive…I know they will stick with me until we figure it out.”